12.
Then the retort is: “What!
Would you define reputation as the esteem of one individual, and ill-repute as the rancorous chatter of one man?
Glory, too, we take to be more widespread, for it demands the agreement of many men.” But the position of the “many” is different from that of “the one.” And why?
Because, if the good man thinks well of me, it practically amounts to my being thought well of by all good men; for they will all think the same, if they know me.
Their judgment is alike and identical; the effect of truth on it is equal.
They cannot disagree, which means that they would all hold the same view, being unable to hold different views.
Book: Moral Letters Vol III
Subtitle: Seneca's timeless letters of advice and wisdom.
Author: Seneca
Chapter: On the intimations of our immortality
Location: Chapter 102, Section 12
Content:
12.
Then the retort is: “What!
Would you define reputation as the esteem of one individual, and ill-repute as the rancorous chatter of one man?
Glory, too, we take to be more widespread, for it demands the agreement of many men.” But the position of the “many” is different from that of “the one.” And why?
Because, if the good man thinks well of me, it practically amounts to my being thought well of by all good men; for they will all think the same, if they know me.
Their judgment is alike and identical; the effect of truth on it is equal.
They cannot disagree, which means that they would all hold the same view, being unable to hold different views.